Analysis of editorial from The Hindu newspaper on October 27, 2026
Dubious retreat: On the National Medical Commission and its MSMER
The National Medical Commission must not be seen as lax on regulation
Society National Medical CommissionMSMERMedical Education in IndiaMARBMedical Colleges Regulation
Sentences
Sentence 1 of 17
English Original
The National Medical Commission (NMC)has denotified and withdrawn its 2023 Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations (MSMER),diminishing the framework of penaltiesvis-à-vis educational standards and infrastructure at medical colleges.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
The National Medical Commission (NMC)
India’s highest government body that oversees and controls medical education
Part 2
has and withdrawn its 2023 Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations (MSMER),
has officially cancelled and taken back its 2023 rules meant to maintain quality in medical colleges,
Part 3
the framework of penalties
weakening the legal system used to punish wrongdoers
Part 4
educational standards and infrastructure at medical colleges.
in relation to teaching quality and physical facilities at medical colleges.
Context and Background
National Medical Commission and MSMER
The National Medical Commission (NMC) replaced the Medical Council of India (MCI) in 2020 as the apex statutory authority regulating medical education and practice in India. In September 2023, the NMC notified the Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations (MSMER) to prescribe minimum educational criteria, but it withdrew these regulations in October 2025 citing overlapping regulatory jurisdictions among its boards.
Sentence 2 of 17
English Original
The move is noteworthyas the MSMER provided for fines of up to ₹5 lakhon faculty members and administratorsfor submitting false information.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
The move is
This step by the government deserves special attention
Part 2
as the provided for fines of up to ₹5 lakh
because the cancelled regulations allowed the board to charge monetary penalties up to 5 lakh rupees
Part 3
on faculty members and administrators
on college teachers and college management officials
Part 4
for submitting false information.
if they provided fake or incorrect records.
Context and Background
Individual Penalties Under MSMER 2023
Under the 2023 MSMER guidelines, the NMC had introduced direct financial penalties of up to 5 lakh rupees specifically on individual doctors, teachers, or administrators who uploaded false credentials or fake attendance logs. Previously, only colleges as whole corporate entities faced penalties, leaving individual fraudsters unpunished.
Sentence 3 of 17
English Original
Fortunately, the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB)retains the power to fine errant institutions up to ₹1 croreunder the 2023 Establishment of Medical Institutions, Assessment and Rating Regulations.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
Fortunately, the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB)
Luckily, the official committee responsible for inspecting and rating medical colleges
Part 2
the power to fine institutions up to ₹1 crore
still keeps the legal authority to impose fines up to 1 crore rupees on colleges that break the rules
Part 3
under the 2023 Establishment of Medical Institutions, Assessment and Rating Regulations.
according to the separate 2023 government regulations covering the setup and grading of medical colleges.
Context and Background
MARB and Institutional Penalties
The Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB) is one of the four autonomous boards constituted under the National Medical Commission Act, 2019. It has the mandate to grant permissions for new medical colleges, carry out inspections, and assess institutional compliance, with the authority to levy financial penalties of up to 1 crore rupees per violation or even cancel admissions.
Sentence 4 of 17
English Original
MSMER was lauded for its intentionto crack down on the deep-seated corruption and malpractice in medical colleges,particularly over ‘ghost faculty’ and ‘ghost patients’.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
MSMER was for its intention
The MSMER regulation was widely praised for its main objective
Part 2
to the corruption and in medical colleges,
to take strict action against long-standing dishonest practices and rule violations in medical colleges,
Part 3
particularly over ‘’ and ‘’.
especially regarding fake doctors hired only on paper and fake patients brought in for inspections.
Context and Background
Ghost Faculty and Ghost Patients in Medical Colleges
To meet mandatory teacher-student ratios and hospital bed-occupancy norms during regulatory inspections, several private medical colleges historically hired temporary doctors for a single day (known as ‘ghost faculty’) and admitted healthy local people as ‘ghost patients’. The NMC introduced Aadhaar-enabled biometric attendance (AEBAS) and hospital management software to curb this chronic malpractice.
Sentence 5 of 17
English Original
The NMC’s justification isthat MSMER also introduced a parallel mechanismallowing undergraduate and postgraduate boards to evaluate institutions,stepping on the MARB’s toes.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
The NMC’s is
The reason given by the National Medical Commission is
Part 2
that MSMER also introduced a parallel mechanism
that the MSMER rules created a duplicate system
Part 3
allowing undergraduate and postgraduate boards to evaluate institutions,
which permitted MBBS and PG boards to inspect and check colleges directly,
Part 4
.
interfering with the official powers and duties of the Medical Assessment and Rating Board.
Context and Background
Autonomous Boards of the NMC
The NMC Act, 2019 created four autonomous boards: the Undergraduate Medical Education Board (UGMEB), the Postgraduate Medical Education Board (PGMEB), the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB), and the Ethics and Medical Registration Board (EMRB). Under the Act, MARB alone holds the primary statutory mandate to inspect, assess, and rate institutions, whereas UGMEB and PGMEB are responsible for curriculum and standards.
Sentence 6 of 17
English Original
However, why the NMC scrapped MSMER wholesaleis unclear.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
However, why the NMC MSMER
However, the reason why the NMC cancelled the entire set of MSMER rules completely
Part 2
is unclear.
remains unexplained and difficult to understand.
Sentence 7 of 17
English Original
The 2023 Postgraduate Medical Education Regulationsremain in forceand include a provisionto fine individual faculty members at postgraduate medical colleges.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
The 2023 Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations
The official 2023 guidelines governing MD, MS, and other post-MBBS medical degrees
Part 2
remain
continue to be legally effective and active
Part 3
and include a
and contain a specific legal clause
Part 4
to fine individual faculty members at postgraduate medical colleges.
allowing authorities to impose monetary fines directly on teachers at PG medical colleges.
Context and Background
PGMER 2023 and Faculty Penalties
The Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023 (PGMER-2023) were notified by the NMC in December 2023 to standardize postgraduate medical training in India. Crucially, PGMER retained explicit powers to penalize individual teachers or examiners who falsify records or fail to perform duties, highlighting a regulatory anomaly where individual penalties persist for PG faculties but were removed for UG colleges after the MSMER withdrawal.
Sentence 8 of 17
English Original
Non-compliance among medical collegesis not uncommon and seldom nipped in the bud,even as the number of medical seats swellswhile the transparency of the medical education system has not improved.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
among medical colleges
Failure to follow mandatory rules by medical institutions
Part 2
is and seldom ,
happens quite frequently and is almost never stopped at an early stage,
Part 3
even as the number of medical seats
even though the total number of available student seats in medical colleges is increasing rapidly
Part 4
while the of the medical education system has not improved.
whereas openness, honesty, and public disclosure in medical education have shown no progress.
Context and Background
Expansion of Medical Seats in India
Over the past decade, undergraduate medical seats (MBBS) in India surged by more than 120%, growing from roughly 51,000 in 2014 to over 1,12,000 in 2024–2025. While this massive expansion aimed to address the doctor-to-population deficit, rapid approvals of private medical colleges raised persistent concerns over substandard facilities, teacher shortages, and inadequate clinical infrastructure.
Sentence 9 of 17
English Original
Notwithstanding the provision to fine individuals at postgraduate centres,the MARB and the NMC can only penalise institutions,which is harder and risks creating a perverse incentiveto accommodate rather than punish,and could mitigate the fear that keeps administrators honest.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
the provision to fine individuals at postgraduate centres,
Despite the existing rule that allows fines on individual teachers in post-MBBS colleges,
Part 2
the MARB and the NMC can only penalise institutions,
the assessment board and the commission are restricted to punishing only entire college organisations,
Part 3
which is harder and risks creating a
which is much more difficult to execute and threatens to create an unintended harmful motive
Part 4
to rather than punish,
to tolerate rule-breaking or make soft compromises instead of enforcing strict penalties,
Part 5
and could the fear that keeps administrators honest.
and could lessen the fear of personal consequences that normally stops college managers from cheating.
Context and Background
Institutional vs Individual Liability in Regulation
When regulators only possess the authority to penalize institutions (such as shutting down a college or withholding admissions), doing so can harm innocent students or lead to costly court battles. This creates a ‘perverse incentive’ for regulators to tolerate minor infractions or impose token compromises, rather than holding individual managers or ghost faculty directly liable.
Sentence 10 of 17
English Original
MSMER also specified timelinesto appeal penalties.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
MSMER also specified timelines
The MSMER rules had also clearly fixed exact time limits
Part 2
to penalties.
for challenging or appealing against imposed fines.
Sentence 11 of 17
English Original
Although the MARB regulations retain the appeal processes,their 15-day deadlinecould conflict with the 60-day period under the NMC Act,potentially creating legal disputes that delay penal action.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
Although the MARB regulations retain the appeal processes,
Even though the MARB guidelines keep the procedures for challenging decisions,
Part 2
their 15-day deadline
the short 15-day limit they set for filing an appeal
Part 3
could with the 60-day period under the NMC Act,
might directly clash with the longer 60-day window allowed by the parent National Medical Commission law,
Part 4
potentially creating legal disputes that delay action.
possibly sparking court cases that slow down or stop punishments against guilty colleges.
Context and Background
Statutory Appeal Mechanisms Under the NMC Act
Section 22(3) of the National Medical Commission Act, 2019 grants medical institutions up to 60 days to file an appeal before the NMC against decisions taken by autonomous boards like MARB. In contrast, specific regulations often impose shorter 15-day limits, creating legal ambiguity that private college managements frequently exploit in High Courts to obtain stay orders against penalties.
Sentence 12 of 17
English Original
There is also a telling incident.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
There is also a incident.
There is also a very revealing and significant event that shows what is really happening.
Sentence 13 of 17
English Original
As part of a proceeding under the RTI Act,the Central Information Commission revealed last yearthat the NMC had stated in 2024that MARB had neither formally assessed nor rated medical collegesand that its standard forms need not be made public.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
As part of a under the Act,
During an official legal hearing conducted under the Right to Information Act,
Part 2
the Central Information Commission revealed last year
India’s highest transparency authority disclosed last year
Part 3
that the NMC had stated in 2024
that the National Medical Commission had admitted in 2024
Part 4
that MARB had neither formally nor rated medical colleges
that its rating board had not conducted any official inspections or awarded ratings to medical colleges
Part 5
and that its standard forms need not be made public.
and argued that its routine college evaluation forms did not have to be shared with the public.
Context and Background
Central Information Commission and MARB Disclosures
The Central Information Commission (CIC) is the highest appellate statutory body under India’s Right to Information Act, 2005. In appeals seeking medical inspection documents, the CIC uncovered that MARB had not published official ratings of medical colleges despite statutory mandates, and had claimed that Standard Assessment Forms (SAFs) filled by colleges were confidential internal records.
Sentence 14 of 17
English Original
In a revised reply in October 2025, it saidthe responding NMC officer’s recordsdid not include any of the corresponding reports.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
In a reply in October 2025, it said
In an updated and modified answer given in October 2025, the commission stated
Part 2
the responding NMC officer’s records
the official files kept by the designated NMC officer
Part 3
did not include any of the reports.
did not contain any of the relevant medical college inspection reports.
Sentence 15 of 17
English Original
However, the 2023 MARB regulationsrequire the Boardto publish its latest annual assessment results.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
However, the 2023 MARB regulations
In contrast, the actual 2023 rating board regulations
Part 2
require the Board
make it legally mandatory for the board
Part 3
to publish its latest results.
to publicly release its most recent yearly inspection and grading reports.
Context and Background
Mandatory Public Disclosure Under MARB Regulations
Under Regulation 8 of the Establishment of Medical Institutions, Assessment and Rating Regulations, 2023, the MARB is legally obligated to place the ratings and assessment reports of medical colleges in the public domain. This mandatory disclosure aims to help NEET aspirants and their parents make informed decisions about college infrastructure, hospital beds, and teaching faculty before taking admission.
Sentence 16 of 17
English Original
If the NMC withdrew MSMERbecause the powers thereunder also exist elsewhere,the public deserves to knowwhether the powers are also being exercisedand whether the outcomes are as publicly accessible as intended.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
If the NMC withdrew MSMER
If the National Medical Commission cancelled the MSMER regulations
Part 2
because the powers also exist elsewhere,
simply because the regulatory powers given under it already exist in other separate rules,
Part 3
the public deserves to know
ordinary citizens have the fundamental right to find out
Part 4
whether the powers are also being
whether those regulatory powers are actually being enforced in practice
Part 5
and whether the outcomes are as publicly as intended.
and whether the inspection findings are made as easily available to the public as originally promised.
Sentence 17 of 17
English Original
Unless the NMC has satisfactory answers for all these lacunae,the withdrawal will appear less like simplificationand more like regulatory relaxation.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
Unless the NMC has satisfactory answers for all these ,
If the National Medical Commission cannot provide convincing and acceptable explanations for all these regulatory gaps and shortcomings,
Part 2
the withdrawal will appear less like
taking back the rules will seem not so much like making administrative procedures simpler,
Part 3
and more like .
and much more like a dangerous weakening of official supervision and control over corrupt colleges.
Sentence 1 of 17
Sentences Breakdown
Editorial Summary
5-Point Summary
1The National Medical Commission (NMC) has withdrawn its 2023 Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations (MSMER), which significantly dilutes the penalty framework for medical colleges failing to meet infrastructure and academic norms.
2The scrapped MSMER regulations were especially notable because they introduced personal monetary fines of up to 5 lakh rupees on faculty members and administrators who submitted false information.
3While the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB) can still fine institutions up to 1 crore rupees, penalising only institutions is more difficult and dilutes individual accountability for rampant issues like ghost faculty.
4Recent RTI disclosures revealed that MARB had failed to formally assess or rate medical colleges or disclose standard evaluation forms, raising serious transparency concerns.
5The editorial warns that unless the NMC clarifies how accountability will be enforced elsewhere, this rollback will be viewed as regulatory weakness rather than reform.
Tone of the Editorial
Critical
Why this tone?
The editorial criticizes the National Medical Commission for abruptly withdrawing regulations that held corrupt medical college administrators and faculty personally accountable. By using terms such as ‘dubious retreat’, ‘perverse incentive’, ‘lacunae’, and ‘regulatory relaxation’, the author condemns the regulatory rollback and demands greater transparency.
Sentence 1 of 17
The National Medical Commission (NMC)has denotified and withdrawn its 2023 Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations (MSMER),diminishing the framework of penaltiesvis-à-vis educational standards and infrastructure at medical colleges.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
The National Medical Commission (NMC)
India’s highest government body that oversees and controls medical education
Part 2
has denotified and withdrawn its 2023 Maintenance of Standards of Medical Education Regulations (MSMER),
has officially cancelled and taken back its 2023 rules meant to maintain quality in medical colleges,
Part 3
diminishing the framework of penalties
weakening the legal system used to punish wrongdoers
Part 4
vis-à-vis educational standards and infrastructure at medical colleges.
in relation to teaching quality and physical facilities at medical colleges.
Sentence 2 of 17
The move is noteworthyas the MSMER provided for fines of up to ₹5 lakhon faculty members and administratorsfor submitting false information.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
The move is noteworthy
This step by the government deserves special attention
Part 2
as the MSMER provided for fines of up to ₹5 lakh
because the cancelled regulations allowed the board to charge monetary penalties up to 5 lakh rupees
Part 3
on faculty members and administrators
on college teachers and college management officials
Part 4
for submitting false information.
if they provided fake or incorrect records.
Sentence 3 of 17
Fortunately, the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB)retains the power to fine errant institutions up to ₹1 croreunder the 2023 Establishment of Medical Institutions, Assessment and Rating Regulations.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
Fortunately, the Medical Assessment and Rating Board (MARB)
Luckily, the official committee responsible for inspecting and rating medical colleges
Part 2
retains the power to fine errant institutions up to ₹1 crore
still keeps the legal authority to impose fines up to 1 crore rupees on colleges that break the rules
Part 3
under the 2023 Establishment of Medical Institutions, Assessment and Rating Regulations.
according to the separate 2023 government regulations covering the setup and grading of medical colleges.
Sentence 4 of 17
MSMER was lauded for its intentionto crack down on the deep-seated corruption and malpractice in medical colleges,particularly over ‘ghost faculty’ and ‘ghost patients’.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
MSMER was lauded for its intention
The MSMER regulation was widely praised for its main objective
Part 2
to crack down on the deep-seated corruption and malpractice in medical colleges,
to take strict action against long-standing dishonest practices and rule violations in medical colleges,
Part 3
particularly over ‘ghost faculty’ and ‘ghost patients’.
especially regarding fake doctors hired only on paper and fake patients brought in for inspections.
Sentence 5 of 17
The NMC’s justification isthat MSMER also introduced a parallel mechanismallowing undergraduate and postgraduate boards to evaluate institutions,stepping on the MARB’s toes.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
The NMC’s justification is
The reason given by the National Medical Commission is
Part 2
that MSMER also introduced a parallel mechanism
that the MSMER rules created a duplicate system
Part 3
allowing undergraduate and postgraduate boards to evaluate institutions,
which permitted MBBS and PG boards to inspect and check colleges directly,
Part 4
stepping on the MARB’s toes.
interfering with the official powers and duties of the Medical Assessment and Rating Board.
Sentence 6 of 17
However, why the NMC scrapped MSMER wholesaleis unclear.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
However, why the NMC scrapped MSMER wholesale
However, the reason why the NMC cancelled the entire set of MSMER rules completely
Part 2
is unclear.
remains unexplained and difficult to understand.
Sentence 7 of 17
The 2023 Postgraduate Medical Education Regulationsremain in forceand include a provisionto fine individual faculty members at postgraduate medical colleges.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
The 2023 Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations
The official 2023 guidelines governing MD, MS, and other post-MBBS medical degrees
Part 2
remain in force
continue to be legally effective and active
Part 3
and include a provision
and contain a specific legal clause
Part 4
to fine individual faculty members at postgraduate medical colleges.
allowing authorities to impose monetary fines directly on teachers at PG medical colleges.
Sentence 8 of 17
Non-compliance among medical collegesis not uncommon and seldom nipped in the bud,even as the number of medical seats swellswhile the transparency of the medical education system has not improved.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
Non-compliance among medical colleges
Failure to follow mandatory rules by medical institutions
Part 2
is not uncommon and seldom nipped in the bud,
happens quite frequently and is almost never stopped at an early stage,
Part 3
even as the number of medical seats swells
even though the total number of available student seats in medical colleges is increasing rapidly
Part 4
while the transparency of the medical education system has not improved.
whereas openness, honesty, and public disclosure in medical education have shown no progress.
Sentence 9 of 17
Notwithstanding the provision to fine individuals at postgraduate centres,the MARB and the NMC can only penalise institutions,which is harder and risks creating a perverse incentiveto accommodate rather than punish,and could mitigate the fear that keeps administrators honest.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
Notwithstanding the provision to fine individuals at postgraduate centres,
Despite the existing rule that allows fines on individual teachers in post-MBBS colleges,
Part 2
the MARB and the NMC can only penalise institutions,
the assessment board and the commission are restricted to punishing only entire college organisations,
Part 3
which is harder and risks creating a perverse incentive
which is much more difficult to execute and threatens to create an unintended harmful motive
Part 4
to accommodate rather than punish,
to tolerate rule-breaking or make soft compromises instead of enforcing strict penalties,
Part 5
and could mitigate the fear that keeps administrators honest.
and could lessen the fear of personal consequences that normally stops college managers from cheating.
Sentence 10 of 17
MSMER also specified timelinesto appeal penalties.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
MSMER also specified timelines
The MSMER rules had also clearly fixed exact time limits
Part 2
to appeal penalties.
for challenging or appealing against imposed fines.
Sentence 11 of 17
Although the MARB regulations retain the appeal processes,their 15-day deadlinecould conflict with the 60-day period under the NMC Act,potentially creating legal disputes that delay penal action.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
Although the MARB regulations retain the appeal processes,
Even though the MARB guidelines keep the procedures for challenging decisions,
Part 2
their 15-day deadline
the short 15-day limit they set for filing an appeal
Part 3
could conflict with the 60-day period under the NMC Act,
might directly clash with the longer 60-day window allowed by the parent National Medical Commission law,
Part 4
potentially creating legal disputes that delay penal action.
possibly sparking court cases that slow down or stop punishments against guilty colleges.
Sentence 12 of 17
There is also a telling incident.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
There is also a telling incident.
There is also a very revealing and significant event that shows what is really happening.
Sentence 13 of 17
As part of a proceeding under the RTI Act,the Central Information Commission revealed last yearthat the NMC had stated in 2024that MARB had neither formally assessed nor rated medical collegesand that its standard forms need not be made public.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
As part of a proceeding under the RTI Act,
During an official legal hearing conducted under the Right to Information Act,
Part 2
the Central Information Commission revealed last year
India’s highest transparency authority disclosed last year
Part 3
that the NMC had stated in 2024
that the National Medical Commission had admitted in 2024
Part 4
that MARB had neither formally assessed nor rated medical colleges
that its rating board had not conducted any official inspections or awarded ratings to medical colleges
Part 5
and that its standard forms need not be made public.
and argued that its routine college evaluation forms did not have to be shared with the public.
Sentence 14 of 17
In a revised reply in October 2025, it saidthe responding NMC officer’s recordsdid not include any of the corresponding reports.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
In a revised reply in October 2025, it said
In an updated and modified answer given in October 2025, the commission stated
Part 2
the responding NMC officer’s records
the official files kept by the designated NMC officer
Part 3
did not include any of the corresponding reports.
did not contain any of the relevant medical college inspection reports.
Sentence 15 of 17
However, the 2023 MARB regulationsrequire the Boardto publish its latest annual assessment results.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
However, the 2023 MARB regulations
In contrast, the actual 2023 rating board regulations
Part 2
require the Board
make it legally mandatory for the board
Part 3
to publish its latest annual assessment results.
to publicly release its most recent yearly inspection and grading reports.
Sentence 16 of 17
If the NMC withdrew MSMERbecause the powers thereunder also exist elsewhere,the public deserves to knowwhether the powers are also being exercisedand whether the outcomes are as publicly accessible as intended.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
If the NMC withdrew MSMER
If the National Medical Commission cancelled the MSMER regulations
Part 2
because the powers thereunder also exist elsewhere,
simply because the regulatory powers given under it already exist in other separate rules,
Part 3
the public deserves to know
ordinary citizens have the fundamental right to find out
Part 4
whether the powers are also being exercised
whether those regulatory powers are actually being enforced in practice
Part 5
and whether the outcomes are as publicly accessible as intended.
and whether the inspection findings are made as easily available to the public as originally promised.
Sentence 17 of 17
Unless the NMC has satisfactory answers for all these lacunae,the withdrawal will appear less like simplificationand more like regulatory relaxation.
Sentence Breakdown
Part 1
Unless the NMC has satisfactory answers for all these lacunae,
If the National Medical Commission cannot provide convincing and acceptable explanations for all these regulatory gaps and shortcomings,
Part 2
the withdrawal will appear less like simplification
taking back the rules will seem not so much like making administrative procedures simpler,
Part 3
and more like regulatory relaxation.
and much more like a dangerous weakening of official supervision and control over corrupt colleges.
Reading Comprehension
Practice questions based on this editorial
Reading Comprehension - National Medical Commission and MSMER
Practice reading comprehension questions based on the editorial about the National Medical Commission withdrawing the 2023 MSMER regulations.
Scoreclever helps you master Current Affairs, English Language, and General Awareness for all Banking, SSC, Railway, and Defence exams. The Scoreclever app has innovative learning techniques that make memorization and revision effortless.