The Hindu Editorial • June 12, 2026 • Read Original

Lows of the land: On Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination

The rejection of the papers of the Congress Rajya Sabha candidate is fraudulent

Scoreclever

Win Exams Cleverly

The Hindu Read Original

8 min read

Analysis of editorial from The Hindu newspaper on June 12, 2026

Lows of the land: On Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination

The rejection of the papers of the Congress Rajya Sabha candidate is fraudulent

Rajya Sabha ElectionMeenakshi NatarajanRepresentation of the People ActElection Commission of IndiaMadhya Pradesh Politics

Sentences

Sentence 1 of 17

English Original

The rejection of Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan’s nomination for the Rajya Sabha election from Madhya Pradesh raises questions of institutional integrity and procedural fairness, going beyond the fate of a single candidate.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The of Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan’s for the Rajya Sabha election from Madhya Pradesh

The decision to refuse Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan’s application to run for the Rajya Sabha election in Madhya Pradesh

Part 2

raises

Brings up or causes people to ask

Part 3

questions of institutional and fairness

Doubts about the honesty of official systems and whether the correct, fair rules were followed

Part 4

going beyond the of a single candidate

Affecting more than just what happens to this one person running for election

Context and Background

Rajya Sabha Election Process in India

The Rajya Sabha (Council of States) is the upper house of India’s Parliament. Members are elected by the elected members of State Legislative Assemblies through a system of proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote. The Returning Officer (RO), appointed by the Election Commission, is responsible for conducting the election and scrutinizing nomination papers.

Sentence 2 of 17

English Original

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the matter on Friday.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The Supreme Court

The highest judicial court in India

Part 2

has agreed

Accepted the request

Part 3

to the matter

To listen to arguments and make a decision on the case

Part 4

on Friday

On the specific day scheduled for the hearing

Sentence 3 of 17

English Original

Meanwhile, all three BJP candidates have been declared elected unopposed, raising further questions on the neutrality and fairness of the process.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

Meanwhile

At the same time that other events were happening

Part 2

all three BJP candidates

The three contestants from the Bharatiya Janata Party

Part 3

have been declared

Have been officially announced by the election authority

Part 4

elected

Won the election without a vote because no other candidate was running

Part 5

raising further questions on the and of the process

Causing more doubts about whether the election officer acted without bias and in a just manner

Context and Background

Elected Unopposed in Rajya Sabha

In Rajya Sabha elections, if the number of validly nominated candidates is equal to or less than the number of vacant seats, the candidates are declared elected unopposed under Section 53 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, without the need for actual voting.

Sentence 4 of 17

English Original

Ms. Natarajan’s nomination was rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) following objections that she had failed to disclose a pending criminal case in Hyderabad in her election affidavit.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

Ms. Natarajan’s nomination

The official proposal and papers of Meenakshi Natarajan to contest the Rajya Sabha election

Part 2

was rejected

Was turned down or disqualified by the authority

Part 3

by the (RO)

By the government official in charge of overseeing the election process and checking nomination papers in the constituency

Part 4

following that she had failed to a pending criminal case in Hyderabad in her election

After opponents complained that she omitted details of a pending court complaint in Hyderabad in her formal sworn statement

Context and Background

Election Affidavit in India

Under Section 125A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and Supreme Court rulings, every candidate contesting elections must file an affidavit (Form 26) disclosing their assets, liabilities, educational qualifications, and criminal antecedents. Filing false information or concealing facts can lead to rejection of the nomination or up to six months of imprisonment.

Sentence 5 of 17

English Original

As the All-India Congress Committee (AICC) in-charge of Telangana, she was named as one of the respondents in a private complaint filed by a former Telugu Desam Party corporator before the court of the Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in 2025.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

As the All-India Congress Committee (AICC) of Telangana

Due to her official role in supervising the Congress party’s affairs in the state of Telangana

Part 2

she

Meenakshi Natarajan

Part 3

was named

Was listed or identified by name in the document

Part 4

as one of the

As one of the defendants who has to respond to a petition or court complaint

Part 5

in a filed by a former Telugu Desam Party before the court of the Additional Metropolitan , Hyderabad, in 2025

In a court case filed directly to the metropolitan judge in 2025 by a former local council member of the TDP

Context and Background

Private Complaint vs. Police FIR

Under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), a private complaint is filed directly before a Magistrate by an individual, alleging an offence. In contrast, a conventional police case starts with a First Information Report (FIR) registered at a police station under Section 154 CrPC, followed by a police investigation.

Sentence 6 of 17

English Original

The complaint was not even against Ms. Natarajan; it was against another Congress leader for alleged inappropriate behaviour and criminal intimidation, and she was mentioned in the petition for allegedly not taking appropriate action against the leader.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The complaint

The legal accusation filed in the court

Part 2

was

Existed as

Part 3

not even against Ms. Natarajan

Did not accuse or target Meenakshi Natarajan at all

Part 4

The complaint document

Part 5

was

Existed as

Part 6

against another Congress leader for inappropriate behaviour and criminal

Targeted a different Congress politician for reportedly misbehaving and threatening someone

Part 7

and she

And Meenakshi Natarajan

Part 8

was mentioned

Was named or included

Part 9

in the

In the written request presented to the court

Part 10

for allegedly not taking appropriate action against the leader

For supposedly failing to take proper disciplinary steps against the accused leader

Sentence 7 of 17

English Original

There is no criminal FIR by the Telangana police against Ms. Natarajan.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

There

An introductory word used to state the existence or non-existence of something

Part 2

Exists

Part 3

no criminal by the Telangana police against Ms. Natarajan

Any formal criminal complaint registered by the Telangana state police force against Meenakshi Natarajan

Sentence 8 of 17

English Original

Unlike a conventional police case, a private complaint originates directly before a court.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

Unlike a police case

In contrast to a standard criminal case that begins with the police registering a complaint

Part 2

a private complaint

A petition submitted by a citizen directly to a judicial magistrate

Part 3

Begins or has its starting point

Part 4

directly before a court

Straight to the judge in a court room without going to the police first

Sentence 9 of 17

English Original

The court had issued notices to the persons named in the complaint, including Ms. Natarajan.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The court

The Metropolitan Magistrate court in Hyderabad

Part 2

had issued

Had officially sent out under the court’s authority

Part 3

Official legal announcements or summons telling people they are mentioned in a case

Part 4

to the persons named in the complaint, including Ms. Natarajan

To all the people mentioned in the TDP corporator’s petition, which included Meenakshi Natarajan

Sentence 10 of 17

English Original

The RO’s decision to use this as grounds for the rejection of the nomination reeks of extreme arbitrariness, and even a conspiracy.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The RO’s decision to use this as for the rejection of the nomination

The decision of the election officer to reject the candidate’s papers based on the Hyderabad complaint

Part 2

Strongly suggests or shows clear signs of something improper or corrupt

Part 3

extreme , and even a

Complete lack of fair rules, and possibly a secret plan to unlawfully exclude the candidate

Sentence 11 of 17

English Original

The law regarding the disclosure of cases is unambiguous.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The law regarding the disclosure of cases

The legal rules governing what court cases a political candidate must report

Part 2

Is or exists as

Part 3

Perfectly clear and leaving no room for confusion or multiple interpretations

Sentence 12 of 17

English Original

Section 33A of the Representation of the People Act requires disclosure only of those cases that carry a punishment of two years or more and, above all, only of those cases in which charges have been framed.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

Section 33A of the

The specific legal clause in India’s election law that decides what criminal history a candidate must declare

Part 2

requires

Makes it mandatory or demands by law

Part 3

only of those cases that carry a punishment of two years or more and, above all, only of those cases in which have been

Revealing only court cases where the jail term is two years or longer, and most importantly, only cases where the judge has officially decided there is enough basic evidence to hold a trial

Context and Background

Section 33A of the RPA, 1951

Section 33A was inserted into the Representation of the People Act, 1951, following the Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in 2002 (Union of India v. Association for Democratic Reforms). It requires candidates to disclose whether they are accused of any offence punishable with imprisonment for two years or more in a pending case in which charges have been framed by a court.

Sentence 13 of 17

English Original

A candidate is not required to disclose cases at the stage of a private complaint or when notices have been issued.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

A candidate

A person contesting an election

Part 2

is not required

Is not bound by law or has no obligation

Part 3

to disclose cases

To declare or list criminal cases in their official papers

Part 4

at the stage of a private complaint or when notices have been issued

When a case has only been filed directly by a citizen in court or when the court has only sent out initial notices to hear the matter

Sentence 14 of 17

English Original

In rejecting the nomination, the RO has clearly overstepped his authority, acted as a judge, and usurped the power of judicial review.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

In rejecting the nomination

By making the decision to disqualify the candidate’s papers

Part 2

the RO

The Returning Officer overseeing the election process

Part 3

has clearly

Has obviously exceeded the limits of what they are allowed to do

Part 4

his

The legal power and rights given to his office

Part 5

acted

Behaved or performed a role

Part 6

as a judge

Like a judicial officer who has the power to decide cases and make final rulings

Part 7

and

And wrongfully or illegally took control of

Part 8

the power of

The constitutional authority of the higher courts to check if administrative decisions are legal

Context and Background

Judicial Review in India

Judicial review is a core feature of the Indian Constitution (specifically Articles 13, 226, and 32), empowering the High Courts and the Supreme Court to examine the constitutionality of legislative acts and executive decisions. Administrative officers, like the Returning Officer, do not possess judicial review powers and cannot interpret laws in a judicial capacity.

Sentence 15 of 17

English Original

It is not for an executive officer to expand the scope of a disqualification provision.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The dummy pronoun representing the action of expanding legal terms

Part 2

Is or exists as

Part 3

not for an to expand the scope of a

Not the job or duty of a government administrative officer to make the rules for disqualifying candidates wider

Sentence 16 of 17

English Original

By declaring the BJP candidates elected unopposed, the RO has created a situation that is difficult to reverse, even if the Supreme Court rules in Ms. Natarajan’s favour.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

By declaring the BJP candidates elected unopposed

Through the action of officially declaring the BJP contestants as winners without holding any voting

Part 2

the RO

The Returning Officer

Part 3

has created

Has caused to exist or brought about

Part 4

a situation that is difficult to

A state of affairs that is very hard to change back to the original form

Part 5

even if the Supreme Court rules in Ms. Natarajan’s

No matter if the highest court decides in favor of Ms. Natarajan’s petition

Sentence 17 of 17

English Original

If it does so, it would be a moral and legal victory for the Congress leader, but the political damage has already been done.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

If it does so

If the Supreme Court decides in her favor and reverses the Returning Officer’s decision

Part 2

The court’s positive decision

Part 3

would be

Would result in being

Part 4

a and legal for the Congress leader

A triumph based on right values and statutory law for Meenakshi Natarajan

Part 5

but the political

However, the loss or harm done to her and her party’s political representation in the Rajya Sabha

Part 6

has already been done

Has already occurred and cannot be reversed or undone

Sentence 1 of 17

Sentences Breakdown

Editorial Summary

5-Point Summary

1 The rejection of Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination papers from Madhya Pradesh has sparked concerns over electoral fairness and institutional integrity.
2 The rejection cleared the way for all three BJP candidates to be elected unopposed, intensifying concerns about the neutrality of the election process.
3 Natarajan’s papers were rejected for failing to disclose a pending private complaint in Hyderabad, which Congress claims does not constitute a formal criminal case requiring disclosure.
4 Under Section 33A of the Representation of the People Act, disclosure is mandatory only for cases where charges have been framed and the potential punishment is two years or more.
5 The editorial condemns the decision as arbitrary and a setback for election integrity, calling on the Election Commission of India to uphold its constitutional duty to protect democracy.

Tone of the Editorial

critical

Why this tone?

The editorial strongly criticizes the Returning Officer’s decision to reject Meenakshi Natarajan’s nomination as arbitrary and fraudulent. It also censures the Election Commission of India for failing to ensure free and fair elections, describing the uncontested win of the BJP candidates as a setback for democratic integrity, using sharp language to condemn the institutional actions.

Sentence 1 of 17

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The rejection of Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan’s nomination for the Rajya Sabha election from Madhya Pradesh

The decision to refuse Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan’s application to run for the Rajya Sabha election in Madhya Pradesh

Part 2

raises

Brings up or causes people to ask

Part 3

questions of institutional integrity and procedural fairness

Doubts about the honesty of official systems and whether the correct, fair rules were followed

Part 4

going beyond the fate of a single candidate

Affecting more than just what happens to this one person running for election

Sentence 2 of 17

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the matter on Friday.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The Supreme Court

The highest judicial court in India

Part 2

has agreed

Accepted the request

Part 3

to hear the matter

To listen to arguments and make a decision on the case

Part 4

on Friday

On the specific day scheduled for the hearing

Sentence 3 of 17

Meanwhile, all three BJP candidates have been declared elected unopposed, raising further questions on the neutrality and fairness of the process.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

Meanwhile

At the same time that other events were happening

Part 2

all three BJP candidates

The three contestants from the Bharatiya Janata Party

Part 3

have been declared

Have been officially announced by the election authority

Part 4

elected unopposed

Won the election without a vote because no other candidate was running

Part 5

raising further questions on the neutrality and fairness of the process

Causing more doubts about whether the election officer acted without bias and in a just manner

Sentence 4 of 17

Ms. Natarajan’s nomination was rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) following objections that she had failed to disclose a pending criminal case in Hyderabad in her election affidavit.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

Ms. Natarajan’s nomination

The official proposal and papers of Meenakshi Natarajan to contest the Rajya Sabha election

Part 2

was rejected

Was turned down or disqualified by the authority

Part 3

by the Returning Officer (RO)

By the government official in charge of overseeing the election process and checking nomination papers in the constituency

Part 4

following objections that she had failed to disclose a pending criminal case in Hyderabad in her election affidavit

After opponents complained that she omitted details of a pending court complaint in Hyderabad in her formal sworn statement

Sentence 5 of 17

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

As the All-India Congress Committee (AICC) in-charge of Telangana

Due to her official role in supervising the Congress party’s affairs in the state of Telangana

Part 2

she

Meenakshi Natarajan

Part 3

was named

Was listed or identified by name in the document

Part 4

as one of the respondents

As one of the defendants who has to respond to a petition or court complaint

Part 5

in a private complaint filed by a former Telugu Desam Party corporator before the court of the Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, in 2025

In a court case filed directly to the metropolitan judge in 2025 by a former local council member of the TDP

Sentence 6 of 17

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The complaint

The legal accusation filed in the court

Part 2

was

Existed as

Part 3

not even against Ms. Natarajan

Did not accuse or target Meenakshi Natarajan at all

Part 4

The complaint document

Part 5

was

Existed as

Part 6

against another Congress leader for alleged inappropriate behaviour and criminal intimidation

Targeted a different Congress politician for reportedly misbehaving and threatening someone

Part 7

and she

And Meenakshi Natarajan

Part 8

was mentioned

Was named or included

Part 9

in the petition

In the written request presented to the court

Part 10

for allegedly not taking appropriate action against the leader

For supposedly failing to take proper disciplinary steps against the accused leader

Sentence 7 of 17

There is no criminal FIR by the Telangana police against Ms. Natarajan.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

There

An introductory word used to state the existence or non-existence of something

Part 2

Exists

Part 3

no criminal FIR by the Telangana police against Ms. Natarajan

Any formal criminal complaint registered by the Telangana state police force against Meenakshi Natarajan

Sentence 8 of 17

Unlike a conventional police case, a private complaint originates directly before a court.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

Unlike a conventional police case

In contrast to a standard criminal case that begins with the police registering a complaint

Part 2

a private complaint

A petition submitted by a citizen directly to a judicial magistrate

Part 3

originates

Begins or has its starting point

Part 4

directly before a court

Straight to the judge in a court room without going to the police first

Sentence 9 of 17

The court had issued notices to the persons named in the complaint, including Ms. Natarajan.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The court

The Metropolitan Magistrate court in Hyderabad

Part 2

had issued

Had officially sent out under the court’s authority

Part 3

notices

Official legal announcements or summons telling people they are mentioned in a case

Part 4

to the persons named in the complaint, including Ms. Natarajan

To all the people mentioned in the TDP corporator’s petition, which included Meenakshi Natarajan

Sentence 10 of 17

The RO’s decision to use this as grounds for the rejection of the nomination reeks of extreme arbitrariness, and even a conspiracy.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The RO’s decision to use this as grounds for the rejection of the nomination

The decision of the election officer to reject the candidate’s papers based on the Hyderabad complaint

Part 2

reeks of

Strongly suggests or shows clear signs of something improper or corrupt

Part 3

extreme arbitrariness, and even a conspiracy

Complete lack of fair rules, and possibly a secret plan to unlawfully exclude the candidate

Sentence 11 of 17

The law regarding the disclosure of cases is unambiguous.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The law regarding the disclosure of cases

The legal rules governing what court cases a political candidate must report

Part 2

Is or exists as

Part 3

unambiguous

Perfectly clear and leaving no room for confusion or multiple interpretations

Sentence 12 of 17

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

Section 33A of the Representation of the People Act

The specific legal clause in India’s election law that decides what criminal history a candidate must declare

Part 2

requires

Makes it mandatory or demands by law

Part 3

disclosure only of those cases that carry a punishment of two years or more and, above all, only of those cases in which charges have been framed

Revealing only court cases where the jail term is two years or longer, and most importantly, only cases where the judge has officially decided there is enough basic evidence to hold a trial

Sentence 13 of 17

A candidate is not required to disclose cases at the stage of a private complaint or when notices have been issued.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

A candidate

A person contesting an election

Part 2

is not required

Is not bound by law or has no obligation

Part 3

to disclose cases

To declare or list criminal cases in their official papers

Part 4

at the stage of a private complaint or when notices have been issued

When a case has only been filed directly by a citizen in court or when the court has only sent out initial notices to hear the matter

Sentence 14 of 17

In rejecting the nomination, the RO has clearly overstepped his authority, acted as a judge, and usurped the power of judicial review.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

In rejecting the nomination

By making the decision to disqualify the candidate’s papers

Part 2

the RO

The Returning Officer overseeing the election process

Part 3

has clearly overstepped

Has obviously exceeded the limits of what they are allowed to do

Part 4

his authority

The legal power and rights given to his office

Part 5

acted

Behaved or performed a role

Part 6

as a judge

Like a judicial officer who has the power to decide cases and make final rulings

Part 7

and usurped

And wrongfully or illegally took control of

Part 8

the power of judicial review

The constitutional authority of the higher courts to check if administrative decisions are legal

Sentence 15 of 17

It is not for an executive officer to expand the scope of a disqualification provision.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

The dummy pronoun representing the action of expanding legal terms

Part 2

Is or exists as

Part 3

not for an executive officer to expand the scope of a disqualification provision

Not the job or duty of a government administrative officer to make the rules for disqualifying candidates wider

Sentence 16 of 17

By declaring the BJP candidates elected unopposed, the RO has created a situation that is difficult to reverse, even if the Supreme Court rules in Ms. Natarajan’s favour.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

By declaring the BJP candidates elected unopposed

Through the action of officially declaring the BJP contestants as winners without holding any voting

Part 2

the RO

The Returning Officer

Part 3

has created

Has caused to exist or brought about

Part 4

a situation that is difficult to reverse

A state of affairs that is very hard to change back to the original form

Part 5

even if the Supreme Court rules in Ms. Natarajan’s favour

No matter if the highest court decides in favor of Ms. Natarajan’s petition

Sentence 17 of 17

If it does so, it would be a moral and legal victory for the Congress leader, but the political damage has already been done.

Sentence Breakdown

Part 1

If it does so

If the Supreme Court decides in her favor and reverses the Returning Officer’s decision

Part 2

The court’s positive decision

Part 3

would be

Would result in being

Part 4

a moral and legal victory for the Congress leader

A triumph based on right values and statutory law for Meenakshi Natarajan

Part 5

but the political damage

However, the loss or harm done to her and her party’s political representation in the Rajya Sabha

Part 6

has already been done

Has already occurred and cannot be reversed or undone

Reading Comprehension

Practice questions based on this editorial

Reading Comprehension - Meenakshi Natarajan Nomination

Practice reading comprehension questions based on the editorial about the rejection of Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan's Rajya Sabha nomination papers.

5 Questions Passing: 70%

Explore by Category

Editorial Categories

Politics and Governance 7 Economy 5 International Relations 2 Science and Technology 2 Environment 2 Society 0 Security 1 Infrastructure and Energy 2 Media and Communication 1 Miscellaneous 5

Vocabulary Feeds

Challenging Vocabulary 131 Idioms and Phrases 80 Phrasal Verbs 42

About Scoreclever

Your Complete Learning Ecosystem

Scoreclever helps you master Current Affairs, English Language, and General Awareness for all Banking, SSC, Railway, and Defence exams. The Scoreclever app has innovative learning techniques that make memorization and revision effortless.

Explore Scoreclever

Anything wrong in this content?

Give feedback

Request a feature?

Contact support

Looking to contribute?

Contact our team

Lows of the land: On Meenakshi Natarajan’s Rajya Sabha nomination

Reading Comprehension

Reading Comprehension - Meenakshi Natarajan Nomination

Explore by Category

Share this editorial

About Scoreclever

Anything wrong in this content?

Request a feature?

Looking to contribute?